Business law

  • Business law
    Group Assignment and Presentation
    1. Create a group of 2 students.
    2. The Lecturer will select a case below to find, read, understand, summarise, and present.
    3. The length of the written assignment is to be approximately 2000 Words. (Each member of the group must write 1000 words).
    4. The presentation slides must be in the IRAC method. Maximum 8 slides, and three short points per slide.
    5. Each member of the group is to present two parts of the IRAC method (I= issues and facts; Relevant laws and principles; A= Arguments of the parties and analysis, C= conclusion and court outcome).
    6. The task is worth a total of 40% of your final marks.
    1. Esanda Finance v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997)
    Assessment Criteria
    Group oral
    presentation and visual slides
    50%
    Written Assignment:
    Identify the facts of the case
    10%
    Written Assignment:
    Explain the relevant law relating to the case 10%
    Written Assignment:
    Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case
    10%
  • 1-17
    Written Assignment:
    Summarise the judgement of the case
    10%
    Written Assignment:
    Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal. 10%
    TOTAL
    100%
    TOTAL
    /40%
    Criteria High Distinction
    80% – Distinction
    70%- 79% Credit
    60-69% Pass
    50-59% Fail
    0-49%
    Group oral
    presentation and visual slides
    At all times:
    1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
    2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable;
    3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case;
    engaging;
    4. the presentation slides were logical and structured; and
    5. the oral presentations were interesting and engaging.
    At all times:
    1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
    2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable;
    3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; and
    4. the presentation slides were logical and structured.
    Most of the times:
    1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
    2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable;
    3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; and
    4. the presentation slides were logical and structured.
    Some of the times:
    1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
    2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable;
    3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; and
    4. the presentation slides were logical and structured.
    At no times:
    1. the group was cohesive and courteous;
    2. the oral presentations were clear and understandable;
    3. the oral presentations were accurate or precise in relation to the details of the case; and
    4. the presentation slides were logical and structured.
    Written Assignment:
    Identify the facts of the case
    All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed with reference to cases with similar facts. All of the facts are clearly and accurately detailed. All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately summarised. Some of the facts are clearly and accurately outlined in brief. The facts are not clearly or accurately outlined.
    Written Assignment:
    Explain the relevant law relating to the case All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed, and the Act and related cases are referenced and discussed. All of the relevant law is clearly and accurately detailed. Most of the relevant law is clearly and accurately summarised. Some of the relevant law is clearly and accurately outlined in brief. The relevant law is not clearly or accurately outlined.
    Written Assignment:
    Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case
    All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed, and there is a synthesis with the relevant law.
    All the legal arguments are clearly and accurately detailed.
    Most of legal arguments are clearly and accurately summarised.
    Some of the legal arguments are clearly and accurately outlined in brief.
    The legal arguments are clearly or accurately outlined.
    Written Assignment:
    Summarise the judgement of the case
    The decision of the judge is accurately detailed with reference to any dissenting judgements or precedents. The decision of the judge is accurately detailed. The decision of the judge is accurately summarised in summary format. The decision of the judge is accurately outlined in brief. The decision of the judge is inaccurate or incomplete.
    Written Assignment:
    Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal. The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.
    The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were perfectly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.
    The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were very clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.
    The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were fairly clear, logical, formatted, and grammatically correct.
    The role, purpose, and scope of the court or tribunal were absent.
    TOTAL
    TOTAL

About the author

HND Assignment Help is the #1 Assignment help company offering hnd business management assignments at most affordable prices and 100% plagiarism free content. Contact for hnd business assignments at hndassignmenthelp@gmail.com. We are pioneer in btec hnd assignments since more than 7 years and have provided btec hnd assignment help for students around the world. Login http://www.hndassignmenthelp.co.uk for more details.

email-icon

hndassignmenthelp@gmail.com

phone-icon

+44-7464884564 (Call and what’s app)

 

student-img

Also Available On

whatsapp-icon
viber-icon
skype-icon

Fulltime Experts

24*7 Support

100+ Subjects Covered
Best Price Guaranteedt

Get A Quick Quote

Attachment is mandatory *