COIT 20268 – Responsive Web Design

COIT 20268 – Responsive Web Design (RWD) (Term 1 – 2017)

Assessment details for: Written Assessment (30 marks).

Main Task

Select and undertake an in-depth evaluation of the following website:

Website:   http://www.newsweek.com/

Upon the completion of the task, you are to provide a formal report documenting your critical evaluation of the website. The review is to be carried out within the context of responsive web design (RWD) and development principles. The report should draw particular attention to the interactive aspects and design aspects relating to responsiveness of the overall website. Support your critique with appropriate RWD principles.

What to Review

The purpose of the report is to provide a critical evaluation of the nominated website and to support your observations and comments convincingly. The nominated website should be reviewed using Google Chrome’s device simulator. For the purpose and intention of this assessment, use only the device simulator for your reviews. This is to ensure that all students have access to consistent and identical review tools.

Your review of the nominated website must be thorough and sufficiently comprehensive to include 5 different screen displays. The recommended settings are as follows.  Students are free

to select the different simulated device (in the Chrome device simulator) they would like to use for the reviews.

(1) Large Display

Generic notebook or desktop with display greater than 1280×768 pixels.

(2) Medium Display

Any mobile device with display approximately 480×640 to 700×960 pixels, in both landscape and portrait orientation.

(3) Tiny display

Any mobile device with display approximately 200×320 to 400×640 pixels, in both landscape and portrait orientation

What to Include

Your report should include:

(1) Clearly identify the nominated website. Provide an overview and description of the nominated website.

(2) Identify and elaborate the main feature or features of the website.

(3) Identify the positive and negative aspects of the website. Draw particular attention to the interaction and usability aspects of the interface.

(4) Invite two other persons to review the nominated website. All reviewers should use identical

device settings. These participants can be your friends, family members or classmates etc. Provide the background (i.e. age, gender, profession) of the participants. Do their views differ from yours’? State why or why not.

(5)  Based  upon  your  critique  and  observation  in  items  (1)  to  (4)  of  the  above,  provide  a

recommendation on how the website should be improved. Conversely, if it does not require further improvement, then provide the reason why that this is the case.

(6) Except for item (4) of the above, all assertions relating to RWD design principles (e.g.

statements like ‘blue text on red background is a poor colour combination’ ) must be supported by references or critical observation. You can cite additional scholarly references other than the textbook. (Note: Do not use Wikipedia as a source of reference).

(7) Comment on the tools (i.e. Chrome device simulator) you used for the review. Elaborate on the advantages and disadvantages of such a tool. Search and briefly comment on similar tools available for testing and reviewing RWD web pages.

(8) Figures or diagrams can be added as needed.

Format of Report

For the purpose of this written assessment you are assumed to be a postgraduate student capable of producing a high quality report.  As such, you should attempt at your best to reflect this quality in the preparation of the written assessment. As a minimum, the report should contain the following, but not limited to:

(1) Introduction – State the purpose and objectives of the report.

(2) Discussion – Build your arguments into a cohesive thread, presenting your observations and findings that you have collated from section (1) to (4) from ‘What to Include’ section.

(3) Recommendation – This is the section where you present your recommendations.

(4) Conclusion – Summarise your findings, consolidating and drawing attention to the main points of the report.

(5) References.

(6) Number of words: 3,000 (maximum) number of words. Your word count should include figure captions and references.

Page formatting: A4 size paper, 2.5cm margins on all sides, single-sided page, single line spacing. Time Romans or New Time Romans font, 12pt font, saved as a single DOC or DOCX Microsoft Word document file. Name and submit the document file as WRIT_ASSN.DOC and WRIT_ASSN.DOCX.

The document should be submitted to your Moodle course website submission portal. Please refer to your course website for more detailed instructions.

Assessment Criteria

The following criteria will be used to assess the quality of your report:

CriteriaSub-Total
Review and Evaluation:

•   Overview and description. (3 marks)

•   Identify and elaborate main features. (6 marks)

•   Identify the positive and negative aspects. (6 marks)

•   Reviews and comments from two other participants. (6 marks)

•   Recommendation on improvements to be made, or otherwise. (6 marks)

•   Demonstrates that in-depth evaluation have been undertaken. (3 marks)

 

 

 

 

30

Relevance to Principles of RWD:

•   Arguments and assertions are sound. (6 marks)

•   Arguments and assertions are supported by RWD principles. (6 marks)

•   Arguments are developed consistently and logically. (6 marks)

•    Demonstrates understanding of the RWD subject matter and applying this competently to the review. (12 marks)

 

 

 

30

Simulation Software Tool Used for Review

•    Advantages and disadvantages of simulation tool used in the review of RWD web pages. (10 marks)

•     Comment on similar tools available for testing and reviewing RWD web pages. (10 marks)

 

 

20

Presentation:

•   Report professionally presented. (2 marks)

•   Grammar, spelling, written style and expression (2 marks)

•   Citation and references. (3 marks)

•   Overall presentation.  (3 marks)

 

 

 

10

Total marks for this assignment

(Total of 90 marks to be scaled down to 30)

 

90


PLAGIARISM

CQUniversity regards plagiarism as a serious offence and it can have serious consequences for you as a student.

Marker’s Guideline

  • To obtain 76-100% of the marks allocated for a specific section of the assessment, the student’s work is expected to demonstrate a very high level of knowledge and understanding of concepts, facts and procedures, and application of knowledge within the scope of the course.
  • To obtain 51-75% of the marks allocated for a specific section of the assessment, the student’s work typically demonstrate a high level of knowledge and understanding of concepts, facts and procedures, and application of knowledge within the scope of the course
  • To obtain 26-50% of the marks allocated for a specific section of the assessment, the student’s work typically demonstrate a sound level of knowledge and understanding of concepts, facts and procedures, and application of knowledge within the scope of the course.
  • To obtain 1-25% of the marks allocated for a specific section of the assessment, the student’s work typically demonstrate a limited level of knowledge and understanding of concepts, facts and procedures, and application of knowledge within the scope of the course
  • 0 marks will be allocated for a specific section of the assessment, where an erroneous or no attempt has been made by the student.

Comments

comments

Athletes as Brand Ambassadors Analysis
ECO100 Economics for business Assignment 2
Fields marked with an * are required

About the author

HND Assignment Help is the #1 Assignment help company offering hnd business management assignments at most affordable prices and 100% plagiarism free content. Contact for hnd business assignments at [email protected] We are pioneer in btec hnd assignments since more than 7 years and have provided btec hnd assignment help for students around the world. Login http://www.hndassignmenthelp.co.uk for more details.